Your observations boil down to opinions and they don’t get to come at the expense of real people who may not have anything to do with a case and could be secondary victims. A public forum is not the appropriate place to exercise your practice of making observational opinions.
The conclusion of your posts still result in opinions and theories and not facts, so just keep that in mind as you post publicly about peoples perceived behavior.
The benefits from open discussions on unsolved cases is the collaborative work that can result in real fact patterns. Cases like John Doe | Harshaw, Wisconsin can be solved with a hive mindset breaking down details of the ring. Cases like Althedia Vernon Vaught | Tulsa, OK have positive discussion zeroing in on the logo on the side of the door and it’s relation to the City of Tulsa. Fugitive cases like Phillip J. Kenley can benefit from creative attention to their wanted status to flush them out of the dark. There is tremendous value in community discussion in that way.
What isn’t helpful is public speculation insinuating that parents are responisble or connecting to something without a supporting fact pattern. Can you keep in the back of your mind and considered while you evaluate things? Sure! But caution is expected in public speculation.
Thanks for the engaging dialog!